Why Caleb Williams Should Anticipate the Cam Newton Treatment Ahead of the NFL Draft: In a recent critique by NFL analyst Merril Hoge, the first of potentially numerous evaluations has emerged regarding USC quarterback Caleb Williams. Hoge expressed a clear perspective, asserting that Williams lacks the exceptional qualities that set players like Patrick Mahomes apart. He cautioned against the notion of attempting to rectify past mistakes, specifically mentioning the Chicago Bears, and advised against expecting Williams to fill the void left by Mahomes. Hoge emphasized that Williams falls considerably short of the unique and outstanding abilities demonstrated by Mahomes, dispelling any comparisons between the two quarterbacks.
Merril Hoge points out several concerns about USC quarterback Caleb Williams, particularly emphasizing issues with his ability to throw on the run. Hoge criticizes the inaccuracy of Williams’ throws in such situations, noting a lack of consistency and precision. He expresses reservations about the prevalence of run-pass option (RPO) plays in Williams’ style, highlighting skepticism about their effectiveness in reaching a Super Bowl. Hoge underscores the importance of pushing the ball down the field and suggests that Williams’ performance lacks anticipation due to the presence of clean pockets. He is particularly critical of Williams’ inconsistency as a mobile thrower, asserting that such a choice is not viable in the NFL. Hoge concludes by expressing disappointment in not seeing anything exceptional in Williams’ arm. Drawing on his track record, Hoge acknowledges the potential for both accurate and inaccurate assessments, citing the example of Cam Newton, whom he initially labeled as “atrocious” before the 2011 draft, only to witness Newton’s subsequent success as a versatile player. This history prompts a sense of caution in interpreting Hoge’s current evaluation of Caleb Williams.
Caleb Williams should brace himself for a treatment reminiscent of what Cam Newton experienced in the NFL draft evaluation process. Newton, once criticized by analysts who even remarked on his “fake smile,” serves as a notable example of the disparate treatment quarterbacks may face. This trend isn’t confined to the past, as evidenced by the recent draft process where quarterback C.J. Stroud had his test scores leaked. The assessment of Williams, much like Merril Hoge’s critique, is expected to be candid and varied – encompassing both praise and criticism. The evaluation landscape is characterized by its earnest nature, where analysts offer genuine opinions, regardless of their severity or favorability. As Williams navigates the scrutiny, he joins the ranks of quarterbacks who have endured diverse assessments in the lead-up to their NFL careers.
Expectations of harsh and biased evaluations for Caleb Williams, particularly in team assessments, loom large, given the historical patterns surrounding Black quarterbacks in the NFL draft. A 2023 analysis by SFGate.com reveals compelling data indicating that Black quarterbacks face substantial bias during the draft process. This pervasive bias can significantly impact the perceptions of talent, potential, and overall value attributed to Black quarterbacks, influencing their draft positions and subsequent opportunities in the league. As Williams confronts the evaluation process, the awareness of this historical context adds a layer of complexity to the analysis, highlighting the persistent challenges faced by Black quarterbacks in the NFL draft.
The evidence strongly supports the assertion that racial bias is a pervasive factor clouding the judgment of NFL teams during the draft process, favoring less qualified quarterbacks as long as they are not Black, as noted by SFGate.com. The analysis indicates that Black quarterbacks bear the brunt of bias in the draft, solely due to their race, leading to enduring penalties that affect their professional careers for years. This discriminatory trend is exemplified by the stark contrast between the criteria for entry into the draft pool for Black and white quarterbacks.
Professor David Berri, an expert in economics at Southern Utah University, highlights the discrepancy, stating that Black quarterbacks often need to be exceptional to even enter the draft pool, while white quarterbacks may be included even if their skills are not extraordinary. In the case of Caleb Williams, the prospect of facing harsh judgments is compounded by his already perceived polarizing image, despite the reality of the situation. This analysis doesn’t single out individuals like Merril Hoge, who offered a positive evaluation of C.J. Stroud last year, emphasizing that certain evaluators, both within teams and the media, may assess Williams in good faith. However, the historical recurrence of biased evaluations against Black quarterbacks suggests that some will inevitably scrutinize Williams unfairly based on his race, perpetuating a systemic issue within the NFL draft process.
Read This Also: Top-Ranked Among North America’s Most Tranquil Beaches